Resolved Cases
Case Study
Case Study

Resolving Disagreement: Case Study of Chemical Manufacturer vs. Distributor in Rajasthan

Explore a case summary involving a disagreement between a Chemical Manufacturer in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and a Distributor in Rajasthan over an outstanding amount due to short payments. Discover how the issue was resolved through mediation and a settlement agreement reached. Learn the importance of clear explanations and effective negotiations in such disputes

2 min read16 sections
Resolving Disagreement: Case Study of Chemical Manufacturer vs. Distributor in Rajasthan

CaseStudy

Got any Questions

Write to us

Share this page

Chemical Manufacturer V Distributor

Digest: Mediation/Conciliation/Dispute/Claimant/Respondent/Invoice/Settlement

Case Summary

The case of disagreement is between a Chemical Manufacturer as the Claimant based in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and a Distributor as the respondent based in Rajasthan. The dispute was regarding an outstanding amount that had accrued as a result of short payments made over a period of a few years against orders delivered. While this was not debated on over a period of time, it became a cause of concern when an audit objection was raised at the board meeting of the claimant's company. The matter was asked to be closed urgently, and the sales and accounts team were deemed responsible for the same.

The Issue

Since the business relationship was a very old one and the orders and supplies were very regular, the sales team was happy to overlook the accumulation of short payments made against invoices made over a period of time. When approached by the company’s representatives, the Respondent was reluctant to accept the claims and also pay them all at once. Fearing the situation and following the CFO’s orders, the case was handed over to PDR COURT for settlement.

The Process

The Mediator painstakingly inspected every invoice, compared it to receipts, and established the validity of the claim. While initiating a discussion with the respondent, the mediator explained the loss that this delay was creating for the claimant. The mediator also urged the respondent to consider the human angle, the blame that was now being laid on the sales staff of the claimant's company, and the adverse effects it had on them. The respondent agreed to communicate with the management of the claimant and take responsibility for the mishap; he also agreed to pay the dues within the next 3 months.

The Settlement Agreement

The Respondent agreed to settle the entire outstanding amount of Rs. 3,15,400/- on or before three months from the date of settlement, i.e. on or before the end of October 2022

The Inference

Clear explanations of an issue and its impact on all stakeholders are a must in negotiations.

We Are Growing

Trusted at scale, growing every year

Tied up with 33+ NBFCs & 1000+ MSMEs
75%
growth in Y22-23
5 Lac
disputes resolved
1000+
enterprise customers